“Mr. Ambassador, you have nearly a hundred naval vessels operating in the North Atlantic right now. Your aircraft have dropped enough sonar buoys that a man could walk from Greenland to Iceland to Scotland without getting his feet wet. Now, shall we dispense with the bull? . . . It would be wise for your government to consider that having your ships and ours, your aircraft and ours, in such proximity is *inherently* dangerous. Wars have begun that way, Mr. Ambassador!”
—Richard Jordan as National Security Advisor Jeffrey Pelt in The Hunt for Red October
March, 1770. Large numbers of armed British troops have been occupying Boston for nearly two years. The soldiers are not there to prevent some foreign force from harming those British citizens, but to enforce the Townshend Acts—a series of heavy taxes on imported goods—against them. In other words, they are there as the muscle to make sure the people of Boston did what the King and Parliament in London said.
On March 5, a squad of these soldiers opens fire on a crowd during a confrontation outside the Old State House. Five civilians are killed. The event will later come to be known as the “Boston Massacre,” and it is among the flash points that will lead to the American Revolution.
It is also the almost inevitable result when a tyrannical central government turns its military against its own citizenry in an attempt to impose its will by force.
July 2, 2008. Then-Senator Barack Obama, campaigning for the Presidency, gives a speech in Colorado Springs in which he called for a “civilian national security force” on the same scale as the U.S. military:
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
[As an aside, this statement alone should have illustrated that the man is completely ignorant or an idiot. At that time, the U.S. military employed about 2.5 million people in and out of uniform, and was spending at a clip of over $700 billion a year, some 20% of the entire budget, and multiples above what the rest of the world, including our allies, spends combined. And he was proposing to create out of thin air a second organization “just as powerful,” and “just as well-funded.”]
But back to the subject, just what is a “civilian national security force,” and what is its mission? Is it to defend the U.S. against foreign threats? Is it to project power and protect U.S. interests abroad? Ask yourself these questions in light of Obama’s 2008 comments as you consider the following.
May 30, 2014. We have previously covered the fact that over the last couple of years non-military branches of the federal government have been stockpiling billions of rounds of ammunition, military-grade weaponry, armored vehicles, and bullet-proof portable checkpoint facilities. You could almost make the case for a small amount of that at DHS, which at least has a counter-terrorism function. But why are huge amounts of guns and ammo being gathered at the Social Security Administration, or at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration? Why are S.W.A.T. teams—yes, I said S.W.A.T. teams—being formed at federal agencies like:
- Department of Agriculture
- Department of Education
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
- Tennessee Valley Authority
- Office of Personnel Management
Your government is stationing armed troops among us, right under our noses. Against whom are these non-military agencies being mobilized? It can’t be against some external threat, because that’s already the function of the existing U.S. military that’s so under-utilized it’s being downsized. That leaves only one alternative: they’re being mobilized against us.
Draw your own conclusions, but I’ll make a few observations:
The Social Security Administration handles a gigantic pool of money, and while at least theoretically in IOU form that pool is currently earmarked for distribution back to the people who contributed it, what would happen if the government unilaterally decided to renege on those IOUs?
The Tennessee Valley Authority provides electricity for most of the Southeastern U.S. What would happen if it closed its 11 coal-fired power plants, thus unemploying a huge number of coal workers, and likely resulting in the rationing of electricity?
The Department of Education is poised via Common Core to nationalize the U.S. education system. What would happen if someone didn’t want to be, um, “educated”?
The Department of Agriculture and the Fish & Wildlife Service are heavily involved in the promotion of biofuels and regulation of endangered species. Both efforts involve the potential seizure of vast swaths of land in the name of ensuring sufficient ethanol feedstocks or preserving this, that, or the other critter.
The Office of Personnel Management has, among its tasks, responsibility for conducting background investigations for background checks. In other words, they’re in the business of collecting information about U.S. citizens.
NOAA has satellites, boats, and airplanes.
And with the exception of TVA (and even that’s federally-owned), the common thread running through all of these agencies is they are under the direct control of the Executive Branch, headed by people appointed directly by the White House.
Rusty, that’s crackpot conspiracy-theory nonsense.
Maybe so, but then I challenge you to come up with a legitimate benign alternative explanation. And even if it is, let me add another piece of the puzzle.
In 2010, the Obama Administration issued DOD Directive 3025.18 (updated September 2012), Defense Support of Civil Authorities, authorizing the deployment of U.S. military assets to respond to domestic situations, including troops engaging in the use of force. The document itself actually has its roots in the 1950s, and at its core is a reasonable defensive-preparedness tool. The current iteration of the directive authorizes federal military intervention on U.S. soil “when necessary to protect Federal property or functions.” That in itself is pretty vague and open to a wildly broad interpretation. But it gets worse.
In addition to authorizing the deployment of troops, the 2010 document also authorizes the loaning out of military assets, including weapons, ammunition, vessels, and aircraft, to requesting agencies. Prior to 2010 I can’t find any reference to the loaning out of military hardware. Moreover, while the predecessors to the 2010 directive spoke in terms of providing assistance to “civil authorities”—i.e., state and local governments—as best I can tell the 2010 document for the first time expands the universe of those who can request combat assistance to “qualifying groups,” which means non-governmental bodies as determined by the Secretary of Defense. In other words, under the guise of protecting federal property or “functions,” or otherwise where it is determined safety or security support is needed, the U.S. military and its assets are now subject to being deployed or loaned out on U.S. soil to anyone Chuck Hagel (or whomever Obama appoints) says.
Imagine the Sierra Club—or the DNC—being able to requisition a combat division, or at least borrow a few thousand military-grade rifles and a couple million rounds of ammo.
Your real military is being gutted, while Obama and his ilk do everything they can to disarm you. Meanwhile unaccountable tentacles of the Executive Branch are arming themselves, and what’s left of the military is being authorized to deploy domestically at the behest of non-governmental entities. The federal government is spending more time and effort preparing to defend itself than defending the borders against foreign invasion; it’s easier for a Guatemalan kid to get into Texas from Mexico than it is for a U.S. Marine. It deploys all kinds of assets to rescue kidnapped Nigerians or find disappearing Malaysian airplanes, and it falls all over itself to feed and house illegals; but it can’t be troubled to lift a finger to rescue embattled Americans in Libya, or to free Americans or their spouses imprisoned for apostasy by Islamo-fascists in Iran or Sudan. It cries bloody murder when an American has the temerity to expose the fact that it’s spying on ordinary citizens, yet broadcasts its schedule for withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan to the world. Everyone on earth is entitled to the protection of the U.S. government except Americans.
Pogo cartoonist Walt Kelly made famous the statement “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”